Edwin May (Remote Viewer): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| college_major = | | college_major = | ||
| website = | | website = | ||
| case_file = | | case_file = | ||
}} | }} | ||
Edwin C. May joined the [[Project Stargate|Stargate Project]] in 1975 as a consultant and was working full-time in 1976. The original project was part of the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory managed by May. With more funding in 1991 May took the project to the Palo Alto offices at SAIC. This would last until 1995 when the [[CIA]]closed the project. | |||
May worked as the principal investigator, judge and the star gatekeeper for the project. Marks says this was a serious weakness for the experiments as May had conflict of interest and could have done whatever he wanted with the data. Marks has written that May refused to release the names of the "oversight committee" and refused permission for him to give an independent judging of the [[Project Stargate|Stargate]] transcripts. Marks found this suspicious, commenting "this refusal suggests that something must be wrong with the data or with the methods of data selection." | |||
{{article summary | {{article summary | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Remote Viewing]] | [[Category: CIA]] | ||
[[Category:People]] | [[Category: Black Projects]] | ||
[[Category: Remote Viewing]] | |||
[[Category: Time Travel]] | |||
[[Category: People]] | |||
[[Category: Military]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:34, 13 September 2025
| Name(s): | Edwin May |
|---|---|
| Occupation: | Remote Viewer |
Edwin C. May joined the Stargate Project in 1975 as a consultant and was working full-time in 1976. The original project was part of the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory managed by May. With more funding in 1991 May took the project to the Palo Alto offices at SAIC. This would last until 1995 when the CIAclosed the project.
May worked as the principal investigator, judge and the star gatekeeper for the project. Marks says this was a serious weakness for the experiments as May had conflict of interest and could have done whatever he wanted with the data. Marks has written that May refused to release the names of the "oversight committee" and refused permission for him to give an independent judging of the Stargate transcripts. Marks found this suspicious, commenting "this refusal suggests that something must be wrong with the data or with the methods of data selection."
