ParaNet BBS/string2
From KB42
ParaNet BBS/string2
| File Name: | string2.txt |
|---|---|
| Author: | Unknown |
| Date: | Unknown |
| Posting BBS: | Unknown |
| BBS Main Page: | ParaNet Main Page |
| Key Words: | ParaNet, UFO, Ufology |
(2238) Thu 12 Nov 92 1:30p Rcvd: Thu 12 Nov 3:27p Cost: 0
By: Uucp, ParaNet(sm) Information Servi (1:104/422)
To: Michael Corbin
Re: Stringfield
St: Pvt Kill Rcvd
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Original: TO ... Michael Corbin of 1:104/422
* ReDirected Using ReDirect Version 1.00 (C)1989 David Nugent
From scicom!csn.org!mcorbin
From: mcorbin@csn.org (Michael Corbin)
To: scicom!mcorbin
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 12:09:01 -0700
Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by csn.org with SMTP id AA10171
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <mcorbin@CSN.ORG>); Thu, 12 Nov 1992 11:54:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199211121854.AA10171@csn.org>
Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 7190; Thu, 12 Nov 92 13:24:33 EST
Received: from PUCC.BITNET by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU (Mailer R2.09 ptf005) with
BSMTP id 4839; Thu, 12 Nov 92 12:24:58 EST
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 20:47:18 EST
Reply-To: FORUM FOR UFOLOGY <UFO-L@BRUFPB.BITNET>
Sender: FORUM FOR UFOLOGY <UFO-L@BRUFPB.BITNET>
From: Charles Mcgrew <mcgrew@DROPOUT.RUTGERS.EDU>
Subject: From the most recent MUFON journal: Stringfield Article
To: Multiple recipients of list UFO-L <UFO-L@BRUFPB.BITNET>
Status: R
These excerpts are from the MUFON UFO JOURNAL No. 294 October 1992.
If you want to see the complete article, get the issue of the MUFON
Journal (available from MUFON, 103 Oldtowne Rd. Seguin, TX 78155), or
to obtain more complete information, send to Mr. Stringfield
himself, address at the end.
Mr. Stringfield has published a number of excellent small books on
UFO "Crash/Retrievals" which I heartily recommend to anyone interested
in the subject. Mr. Stringfield has, over the years, cultivated a
number of US-governmental/military/intelligence sources, most of which
he writes of as anonymous at their own request (that is, he knows who
they are, but won't put it in his books.) This may be troubling to
some readers, but it would appear to be the only way he can get his
information.
THE ET CONNECTION
by Leonard H. Stringfield
Hopefully we are a step closer to breaching the proverbial wall of
secrecy by releasing this story, which chronicles an alleged major
event that may represent a rewarding breakthrough for mankind's
right-to-know.
Although details at this time are scant, the two sources responsible
for the story are credibly recognized in scientific circles. One, who
is acting as intermediary for the prime source, a longtime friend and
colleague, is a professor of physics at a major Midwest university.
The prime source is a highly educated individual with a strong
scientific background, who must remain anonymous for obvious reasons.
He chose to take his friend into his confidence to relate that he had
at an unspecified time a one-on-one, face-to-face meeting with a live
extraterrestrial entity under prearranged conditions.
As recorded in my book, The Inner Sanctum, Status Report VI (published
September 1991), contact with my source began with the investigation
of a UFO crash/retrieval incident, which gave us the opportunity to
work closely for many months, building a lasting mutual trust in our
research endeavors. This relationship was exemplified in March of
1990, when my friend called to alert me that sensitive information
would follow by mail. His edited letter stated in part:
Dear Len:
Here are the details of my friend's experience with a live
EBE in the Seventies. I thought it best if I didn't say
anything over the phone about my writing this letter.
First of all, I trust this individual about as much as one can
trust anyone, to the extent that if he is Iying to me, I
really don't know who I can believe.
He was asked by officials (either government or military, I
don't know which) to meet with the extraterrestrial in order
to attempt to communicate telepathically with it.
I asked him where they keep it, and he gave me a vague answer
that did tell me where.
He also said that the military had devised some kind of
electrostatic barrier for study of the limits of signal ranges
at a specified location where dialogue took place.
He told me an interesting thing about the crystal communicator
that the EBE had there. He didn't see it himself, but spoke
to someone who had seen it. Apparently each event that happens
leaves behind some kind of biogravity trace, like the infrared
trace we might leave for a few days if we walk across a field.
According to information given to my friend, this crystal
device distinguishes between biomagnetic and bio-gravitational
signals in the human brain's own crystallinefield and can sort
out bio-gravity traces from the past and can coordinate traces
from specific events and show them in the crystal.
Well, Len, that's about it. If you have any questions about
any of this, I will be glad to try to answer them. I think I
have told you all of the details I know; but if I think of
anything else I'll let you know. As we discussed previously,
please don't mention these details to anyone.
In late 1990 and early 1991, following this disclosure, other credible
sources were also sharing bits and pieces of sensitive information,
some of it dealing with UFO crash/retrievals, suspected government
interaction in abduction cases, a hostile confrontation in a war zone
and military aircraft encounters, et cetera. As a result, I wrote The
Inner Sanctum, in which I included this terse reference on page 126:
"... two sources tell of scientific and/or military contact with a
live alien. One, who was more specific, is a physicist, whose friend,
also a scientist, was assigned to interrogate a live entity in
isolation under rigid control conditions. The details entrusted to me
are, by request, not publishable at this time."
Further sensitized by the influx of new information from deep-throat
sources, I speculated in the Prologue of my book that some of it may
have been initiated from inside the wall of secrecy, either as part of
a master plan to spoon-feed the public, or, because of a sudden dire
urgency. My friend's source gave no hint as to his role, but I learned
later that he evinced some personal concerns.
In January 1992 my friend and his source met again. Because I had
received information from firsthand medical sources in the late 1970s
about the ET's physiological features, he asked before the meeting
that I submit a list of pertinent questions to ask his contact. My
friend's letter of January 18, with significant parallelisms, follows,
in part:
The extraterrestrial was insectoid in appearance, and stood
about four feet tall. It has large, black, penetrating,
wrap-around eyes that were both powerful and riveting. They
seemed to be 30-40 times stronger than ours, so it could see
well at night, and in dark environments. Its nose and mouth
were insignificant. Its arms were long with respect to its
body, and its hands had four fingers, two of which seemed
longer than the others. My contact could not determine its
sex. It had some kind of head covering on (not a helmet), and
also wore clothing; but my contact hardly noticed, since its
face was so powerful and riveting. He doesn't know if it had
a beltline system on. It didn't gesture or move (I think I
remember this correctly). My contact did not notice any eye
movement or blinking. It was too dark to tell if the skin was
reptilian. It was cooperative, not hostile.
The room was dimly lit, with modest furniture and a single
window. My contact was seated, and it was standing. There was
no one else in the room, but my contact thought he was
probably being watched, possibly through electronic or
paranormal surveillance.
My contact would not say how he was brought in, and would not
say when their meeting occurred. He would only say that he has
been cooperating with the government since 1973.
The extraterrestrial was not captured, and there was no
intercept mission. Rather, it was part of an exchange program.
My contact would not say when the exchange took place. Their
ship (and others) operates out of both east and west coast
areas, which accounts for the confusion among UFO researchers.
My contact said that we benefitedfar more from the exchange
program (with the higher or ethical ETs) than they did.
Dialogue with the ET was normally behind some kind of
electrostatic barrier, but the barrier and locks were useless,
since it could free itself any time it wanted to. It chose to
stay where we wanted it.
Their mission here is scientific, not hostile. My contact
communicated with it telepathically for roughly 35 minutes
about various topics in astronomy and astrophysics. He
wouldn't tell me what they told each other mentally, except
that it said that it came from a star system so far away that
it wasn't worth giving the location. It was not from the Zeta
Reticuli star system -- much farther away.
My contact said that there are four different kinds of greys.
He had the impression that this one seemed to take energy from
the surroundings rather than through eating or absorption by
photosynthesis. There are lower (unethical) and higher
(ethical) ETs involved with genetic experimentation.
We are in trouble because most experts cannot discern the
intent of the lower ETs from the higher ETs who respect human
freedom. All governments in the world originally kept
everything quiet, until they could find out what was going on.
Then, as more information was gotten and an agreement with the
aliens was made, it became harder to release the information.
There could be a massive public outcry when this is exposed,
forcing resignations on a grand scale -- governmental,
military, etc. New people will be needed to come forth with
new ideas.
My contact said that the meeting was a powerful, riveting
experlence.
Comments: Persistent rumors, since the late 1960s tell of ET contact
and/or clandestine connection with officialdom. Stories cover a wide
spectrum: cooperative treaties for peaceful universal coexistence or,
on a grimmer note, the takeover of underground bases and a broken
treaty, hostile skirmishes, exchange of abduction rights for
technology, animal and human mutilations, ad infinitum. If any of
these scenarios are true, except for the Utopian prospects for
peaceful universal coexistence, then one need not expect an official
admission -- especially if a superior race is dictating the terms.
According to my friend's source, the ET he met as a representative of
one race of greys is here for non-hostile scientific purposes. Why,
then, has officialdom not shared this bit of seeming harmony with
humanity? Why maximum secrecy?
But to appraise or put into perspective the far-reaching implications
of an alleged human-extraterrestrial exchange program, we need more
definitive and updated information. If, as my source avers, we are
visited by more than one extraterrestrial race, each possibly with a
different agenda, we are left only to ponder the intents of those not
agreeing to formal contact or an exchange program.
What for example, is the purpose of abductions, a violation of human
rights? What, if true, is the meaning behind the claims of genetic
manipulation or fetus snatching? Perhaps such a practice, employed by
one or all of the greys, can be objectively explained as scientific,
ethical or non-hostile. But for now, there are too many gray areas
overall, which may involve a hidden and more sinister agenda.
My friend's story, with the illustrious credentials of his source, is
extraordinary. For both to surface, despite anonymity, is an example
of courage when I consider they are not in lock step with the
mainstream of scientific rationale. It may also prove difficult for
the myopic media to put the story into reportorial perspective,
especially when the mindset of the average citizen is mainly concerned
with traditional mundane affairs.
I have every reason to believe the word of my physicist friend, just
as I have believed my medical informants who provided firsthand
information to me about the alien anatomy. When I questioned my friend
about his source's veracity or whether he may be playing the
disinformation game, he replied, as an analogy, that he had always
believed his mother and was quick to put his colleague in the same
entrusting category.
Mr. Stringfield can be reached at:
4412 Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, Ohio 45227
USA
If anyone wants a price-list for his books, please let me know.
