Cisco Grove Incident -- The Titan ICBM Program: The Other Missile

From KB42

Cisco Grove Incident -- The Titan ICBM Program: The Other Missile

The SM-68 Titan

Feature Detail
Designation SM-68 Titan I; SM-68B Titan II (the operational version in 1964)
Type Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM); two-stage liquid-fueled
Range Titan II: approximately 9,300 miles (15,000 km); capable of reaching virtually any target in the Soviet Union from American launch sites
Warhead Titan II carried the W53 warhead with a yield of approximately 9 megatons -- one of the most powerful nuclear weapons ever deployed by the United States
Operational period Titan I: 1962-1965; Titan II: 1963-1987
Propulsion Aerojet General Corporation was the primary developer of the Titan's liquid-fueled rocket engines; both the first and second stage engines were Aerojet products
Classification Among the most highly classified operational systems in the U.S. arsenal in 1964

The Titan in 1964

In September 1964, the Titan II was one of the United States' primary strategic nuclear delivery systems. Fifty-four Titan II missiles were deployed in hardened silos across six U.S. Air Force bases. Each carried a 9-megaton warhead -- an order of magnitude more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb.

Aerojet's Sacramento facility manufactured the propulsion systems for this missile. Workers on the Titan program, like workers on Polaris, were not building peripheral equipment -- they were contributing to the most consequential weapons systems in human history.

The Dual Program Context

Shrum worked on both Polaris and Titan -- contributing to both the sea-based and land-based legs of the U.S. nuclear triad. This dual program exposure gave him:

  • Familiarity with the engineering requirements of multiple rocket propulsion systems
  • An understanding of both solid and liquid rocket motor designs
  • Experience with the precision metallic components used in ballistic missile construction
  • Security clearances appropriate to multiple classified programs

The breadth of his aerospace work makes his technical assessments more rather than less credible. He was not a single-program specialist but a multi-system aerospace worker.